Trusted problems in AirDrops: Binance’s message
In the analysis recently published by Binance, the largest cryptocurrency exchange platform according to daily volume was emphasized by several major shortcomings in Airdrop processes on various platforms, emphasizing the feeling of distrust in the community to these events. Cases such as Pudga penguins and hyperliquid have gone, sharp with failure with other projects.
To illustrate, the penguin pudges got a perfect score of 10/10 from Binance and emphasized in December Airdrop, which generously attributed toke holders to NFT holders. This process has created a large extent of positive perception among users and represented a strict model of its own capital and preparation.
On the other hand, hyperliquid was also awarded a note of 9/10, which was recognized as an exceptional way of rewarding participants and introducing a new standard in decentralized funding thanks to its Airdrop scheduled for November 2024.
However, the analysis revealed strong criticism of other projects, such as Redstone, whose last opening aroused significant controversy. The Redstone team reduced the distribution of tokens reserved for the community and from 9.5 % to 5 % just before the market, causing a wave of dissatisfaction between the holders of chips. The report noted that “the members of the crypt community quickly condemned the platform for this last one -sided change and accused Redstone of insufficient products to Airdrop”, resulting in evaluation of the 2/10 project.
Another remarkable situation is the situation of Airdrop de Scroll in October 2024, which received a note 3/10. The lack of clarity in the criteria of competence caused unfair division and frustrating users waiting for a fairer part. Although almost 70 million SCR tokens were distributed, which represents about 7 % of the total offer, it was not enough to satisfy the spirits.
In addition, Kaito suffered serious criticism for his February Airdrop, where 43.3 % of chips were assigned to his team and his investors, while only 10 % were intended for his holders. Impulsive sales of organized influenced influenced the decrease in the prices of chips and confidence in the platform.
Given these different scenarios, Binance has re -confirmed the importance of transparency and clear communication of the standards and objectives of Airdrops on the side of the platforms to maintain users’ confidence. In addition, the studies recommended that the platforms to receive fixed points of points for tokens and interactions based on the actual community activity to create the base of loyal users and prevent abuse.
Points to remember
- Transparency is essential for trust in AirDropy.
- The fair division positively affects the perception of the user.
- Actions of influencers can affect the credibility of the project.
- Cases of penguin and hyperliquide pudgy illustrate good procedures.
- Changes in last minute posts can cause notorious dissatisfaction.
- It is essential to set up clear fitness standards to prevent frustrations.
This analysis emphasizes challenges that the crypto community has to overcome to restore confidence in Airdrops. It would be interesting to think about measures to be guaranteed in the future by more transparent and fairer processes. This questioning leads us to consider how platforms can redefine their strategies to support climate of trust in users and at the same time support their determination.
Source: portalcripto.com.br
Not investment counseling
Information provided on this website should not be considered as investment advice, financial advice, business advice or other advice and in this way no content of the website should be considered. Lesnews do not recommend buying, selling or cryptocurrencies. Be vigilant and before making any investment decision to consult your financial advisor
Notification of irresponsibility
Notification of irresponsibility. Lesnews does not approve of any content or product that appears on this page. Although we try to provide you with all the important information we have obtained, the readers must carry out their own research before carrying out any steps related to the company and take full responsibility for their decision and this article cannot be considered investment advice.
This article was created by artificial intelligence. Among Lesnews our editors run AI to develop innovative articles from Reliable sources. If you see an inappropriate image or content, point to us via the DMCA form – we will act quickly to fix it. / This article was generated by artificial intelligence. In Lesnews, our editors use AI to create innovative articles Source from Reliable references. If you come across any picture or content that appears to be inappropriate, tell us via the DMCA form – we will immediately accept it.